2011 BMW Active E vs 2018 Audi TT Coupe
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 102 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $750 vs $2300 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Electricity vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 BMW Active E | 2018 Audi TT Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2018 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Electricity | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (AM-S6) |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | — | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 107 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 96 | 30 |
| Combined MPG | 102 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $750 | $2300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | — | 336.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →🚗 2018 Audi TT Coupe
Subcompact Cars with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Audi TT Coupe Profile →🔗 Related