2011 BMW Active E vs 2011 Suzuki Swift
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 102 MPG vs 29 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $750 vs $2050 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Electricity vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 BMW Active E | 2011 Suzuki Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Electricity | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (A1) | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | — | 1.6 |
| City MPG | 107 | 27 |
| Highway MPG | 96 | 34 |
| Combined MPG | 102 | 29 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $750 | $2050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | — | 306.44827586206895 |
🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →🚗 2011 Suzuki Swift
Subcompact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Swift Profile →🔗 Related