2011 BMW Active E vs 2016 Volkswagen Eos
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 102 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $750 vs $2750 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Electricity vs Premium Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 BMW Active E | 2016 Volkswagen Eos |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2016 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Electricity | Premium Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (AM-S6) |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | — | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 107 | 22 |
| Highway MPG | 96 | 30 |
| Combined MPG | 102 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $750 | $2750 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | — | 354.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →🚗 2016 Volkswagen Eos
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volkswagen Eos Profile →