2005 Buick LeSabre vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde/LHS
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 21 MPG vs 22 MPG combined — Chrysler Concorde/LHS is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2850 vs $2700 — Chrysler Concorde/LHS saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2005 Buick LeSabre | 2004 Chrysler Concorde/LHS |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2005 | 2004 |
| Class | Large Cars | Large Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.8 | 2.7 |
| City MPG | 18 | 19 |
| Highway MPG | 27 | 27 |
| Combined MPG | 21 | 22 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2850 | $2700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 423.1904761904762 | 403.95454545454544 |
🚗 2005 Buick LeSabre
Large Cars with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Buick LeSabre Profile →🚗 2004 Chrysler Concorde/LHS
Large Cars with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chrysler Concorde/LHS Profile →