2020 BYD e6 vs 2026 Mazda CX-30
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 72 MPG vs 27 MPG combined — BYD e6 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1050 vs $2500 — BYD e6 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Electricity vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2020 BYD e6 | 2026 Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2020 | 2026 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Electricity | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | — | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 73 | 24 |
| Highway MPG | 71 | 31 |
| Combined MPG | 72 | 27 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1050 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | — | 329.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 10/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 5/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 4/5 |
🚗 2020 BYD e6
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 72 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BYD e6 Profile →🚗 2026 Mazda CX-30
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda CX-30 Profile →🔗 Related