2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2026 Jeep Cherokee
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 18 MPG vs 37 MPG combined — Jeep Cherokee is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3300 vs $1800 — Jeep Cherokee saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2026 Jeep Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2004 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| City MPG | 17 | 39 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 35 |
| Combined MPG | 18 | 37 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3300 | $1800 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 493.72222222222223 | 241.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
🚗 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Tracker Profile →🚗 2026 Jeep Cherokee
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 37 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Cherokee Profile →