2008 Chevrolet Uplander vs 2015 Mazda 5
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 19 MPG vs 24 MPG combined — Mazda 5 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3150 vs $2500 — Mazda 5 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2008 Chevrolet Uplander | 2015 Mazda 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2008 | 2015 |
| Class | Minivan - 2WD | Minivan - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic (S5) |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.9 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 16 | 21 |
| Highway MPG | 23 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 19 | 24 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3150 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 467.7368421052632 | 370.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
🚗 2008 Chevrolet Uplander
Minivan - 2WD with 19 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Uplander Profile →🚗 2015 Mazda 5
Minivan - 2WD with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 5 Profile →