2009 Chrysler Aspen vs 2026 Dodge Durango
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 21 MPG vs 20 MPG combined — Chrysler Aspen is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2850 vs $3400 — Chrysler Aspen saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2026 Dodge Durango |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2009 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic 8-spd |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 5.7 | 3.6 |
| City MPG | 20 | 18 |
| Highway MPG | 22 | 25 |
| Combined MPG | 21 | 20 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2850 | $3400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 423.1904761904762 | 434.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 4/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 4/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 4/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 4/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 3/5 |
🚗 2009 Chrysler Aspen
Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chrysler Aspen Profile →🚗 2026 Dodge Durango
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 20 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Dodge Durango Profile →