2003 Daewoo Lanos vs 2026 Toyota Corolla Cross
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 42 MPG combined — Toyota Corolla Cross is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $1600 — Toyota Corolla Cross saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2003 Daewoo Lanos | 2026 Toyota Corolla Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2003 | 2026 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Automatic (AV-S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 20 | 46 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 39 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 42 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $1600 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 211.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
🚗 2003 Daewoo Lanos
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Daewoo Lanos Profile →🚗 2026 Toyota Corolla Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 42 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Toyota Corolla Cross Profile →🔗 Related