2014 Dodge Avenger vs 2003 Ford Escort
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — Ford Escort is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $2400 — Ford Escort saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2014 Dodge Avenger | 2003 Ford Escort |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2014 | 2003 |
| Class | Midsize Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 21 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 29 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $2400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 371.0 | 355.48 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2014 Dodge Avenger
Midsize Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Dodge Avenger Profile →🚗 2003 Ford Escort
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escort Profile →🔗 Related