2012 Dodge Caliber vs 2013 Toyota Matrix
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 27 MPG vs 29 MPG combined — Toyota Matrix is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2200 vs $2050 — Toyota Matrix saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2012 Dodge Caliber | 2013 Toyota Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2013 |
| Class | Small Station Wagons | Small Station Wagons |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| City MPG | 24 | 26 |
| Highway MPG | 31 | 32 |
| Combined MPG | 27 | 29 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2200 | $2050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 329.14814814814815 | 310.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 8/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 8/10 |
🚗 2012 Dodge Caliber
Small Station Wagons with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Dodge Caliber Profile →🚗 2013 Toyota Matrix
Small Station Wagons with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Toyota Matrix Profile →🔗 Related