2026 Dodge Durango vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 20 MPG vs 18 MPG combined — Dodge Durango is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3400 vs $3300 — Chevrolet Tracker saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Dodge Durango | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2004 |
| Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.6 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 18 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 25 | 20 |
| Combined MPG | 20 | 18 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3400 | $3300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 434.0 | 493.72222222222223 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 4/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 4/10 | —/10 |
| Overall Safety | 4/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 3/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Dodge Durango
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 20 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Dodge Durango Profile →🚗 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Tracker Profile →