2005 Ford E250 Econoline vs 2014 Ford E250 Van
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 15 MPG vs 15 MPG combined
- Annual fuel cost: $4000 vs $4000
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2005 Ford E250 Econoline | 2014 Ford E250 Van |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2005 | 2014 |
| Class | Vans, Cargo Type | Vans, Cargo Type |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 8 | 8 |
| Displacement (L) | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| City MPG | 13 | 13 |
| Highway MPG | 17 | 16 |
| Combined MPG | 15 | 15 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $4000 | $4000 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 592.4666666666667 | 607.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 2/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 2/10 |
🚗 2005 Ford E250 Econoline
Vans, Cargo Type with 15 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford E250 Econoline Profile →🚗 2014 Ford E250 Van
Vans, Cargo Type with 15 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford E250 Van Profile →🔗 Related