2026 Ford Escape vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 40 MPG vs 18 MPG combined — Ford Escape is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1700 vs $3300 — Ford Escape saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Ford Escape | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2004 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (variable gear ratios) | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 42 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 37 | 20 |
| Combined MPG | 40 | 18 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1700 | $3300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 222.0 | 493.72222222222223 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 8/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 9/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2026 Ford Escape
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 40 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escape Profile →🚗 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Tracker Profile →