2003 Ford Escort vs 2002 Suzuki Esteem
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 25 MPG vs 27 MPG combined — Suzuki Esteem is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2400 vs $2200 — Suzuki Esteem saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2003 Ford Escort | 2002 Suzuki Esteem |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2003 | 2002 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| City MPG | 23 | 24 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 32 |
| Combined MPG | 25 | 27 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2400 | $2200 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 355.48 | 329.14814814814815 |
🚗 2003 Ford Escort
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escort Profile →🚗 2002 Suzuki Esteem
Subcompact Cars with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Esteem Profile →🔗 Related