2018 Ford Focus vs 2026 Mazda 3
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 107 MPG vs 30 MPG combined — Ford Focus is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $700 vs $2250 — Ford Focus saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Electricity vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2018 Ford Focus | 2026 Mazda 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2018 | 2026 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Electricity | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | — | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 118 | 27 |
| Highway MPG | 96 | 36 |
| Combined MPG | 107 | 30 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $700 | $2250 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | — | 294.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 10/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 10/10 | 6/10 |
🚗 2018 Ford Focus
Compact Cars with 107 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Focus Profile →🚗 2026 Mazda 3
Compact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 3 Profile →🔗 Related