2019 Ford Taurus vs 2020 Chevrolet Impala
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 21 MPG vs 22 MPG combined — Chevrolet Impala is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2850 vs $2700 — Chevrolet Impala saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2019 Ford Taurus | 2020 Chevrolet Impala |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2019 | 2020 |
| Class | Large Cars | Large Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| City MPG | 18 | 19 |
| Highway MPG | 26 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 21 | 22 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2850 | $2700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 428.0 | 406.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 5/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 4/5 |
🚗 2019 Ford Taurus
Large Cars with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Taurus Profile →🚗 2020 Chevrolet Impala
Large Cars with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Impala Profile →