2026 GMC Acadia vs 2026 Audi Q4 e-tron
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 22 MPG vs 115 MPG combined — Audi Q4 e-tron is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3050 vs $650 — Audi Q4 e-tron saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2026 GMC Acadia | 2026 Audi Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-spd | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | — |
| City MPG | 20 | 125 |
| Highway MPG | 26 | 104 |
| Combined MPG | 22 | 115 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3050 | $650 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 404.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 4/10 | 9/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 4/10 | 10/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 4/5 | — |
🚗 2026 GMC Acadia
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full GMC Acadia Profile →🚗 2026 Audi Q4 e-tron
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 115 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Audi Q4 e-tron Profile →🔗 Related