2026 GMC Canyon vs 2026 Ford Ranger
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 20 MPG vs 23 MPG combined — Ford Ranger is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3400 vs $2950 — Ford Ranger saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 GMC Canyon | 2026 Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD | Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-spd | Automatic (S10) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.7 | 2.3 |
| City MPG | 19 | 21 |
| Highway MPG | 23 | 25 |
| Combined MPG | 20 | 23 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3400 | $2950 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 443.0 | 395.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | 4/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 3/5 | — |
🚗 2026 GMC Canyon
Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD with 20 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full GMC Canyon Profile →🚗 2026 Ford Ranger
Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD with 23 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Ranger Profile →🔗 Related