2011 Honda Element vs 2004 Suzuki Vitara
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 22 MPG vs 18 MPG combined — Honda Element is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2700 vs $3300 — Honda Element saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 Honda Element | 2004 Suzuki Vitara |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2004 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 5-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 20 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 24 | 20 |
| Combined MPG | 22 | 18 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2700 | $3300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 403.95454545454544 | 493.72222222222223 |
🚗 2011 Honda Element
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Honda Element Profile →🚗 2004 Suzuki Vitara
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Vitara Profile →🔗 Related