2010 Jeep Commander vs 2026 GMC Terrain
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 16 MPG vs 27 MPG combined — GMC Terrain is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3750 vs $2500 — GMC Terrain saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2010 Jeep Commander | 2026 GMC Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2010 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 5-spd | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 8 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 5.7 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 14 | 26 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 16 | 27 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3750 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 555.4375 | 329.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 4/5 |
🚗 2010 Jeep Commander
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 16 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Commander Profile →🚗 2026 GMC Terrain
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full GMC Terrain Profile →🔗 Related