2010 Jeep Commander vs 2026 Jeep Compass
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 16 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — Jeep Compass is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3750 vs $2600 — Jeep Compass saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2010 Jeep Commander | 2026 Jeep Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2010 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 5-spd | Automatic 8-spd |
| Cylinders | 8 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 5.7 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 14 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 31 |
| Combined MPG | 16 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3750 | $2600 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 555.4375 | 335.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 4/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 4/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 3/5 |
🚗 2010 Jeep Commander
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 16 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Commander Profile →🚗 2026 Jeep Compass
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Compass Profile →🔗 Related