2026 Jeep Compass vs 2011 Mazda Tribute
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 26 MPG vs 32 MPG combined — Mazda Tribute is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2600 vs $1850 — Mazda Tribute saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Jeep Compass | 2011 Mazda Tribute |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2011 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-spd | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 23 | 34 |
| Highway MPG | 31 | 30 |
| Combined MPG | 26 | 32 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2600 | $1850 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 335.0 | 277.71875 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
| Overall Safety | 4/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 3/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Jeep Compass
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Compass Profile →🚗 2011 Mazda Tribute
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 32 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda Tribute Profile →🔗 Related