2020 Kia Optima vs 2002 Mazda 626
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 42 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — Kia Optima is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1400 vs $2400 — Kia Optima saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2020 Kia Optima | 2002 Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2020 | 2002 |
| Class | Midsize Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AM6) | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 40 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 45 | 29 |
| Combined MPG | 42 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1400 | $2400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 213.0 | 355.48 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 9/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 9/10 | —/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 5/5 | — |
🚗 2020 Kia Optima
Midsize Cars with 42 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Kia Optima Profile →🚗 2002 Mazda 626
Midsize Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 626 Profile →🔗 Related