2012 Maybach 62 vs 2009 Mercury Sable
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 12 MPG vs 21 MPG combined — Mercury Sable is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $5750 vs $2850 — Mercury Sable saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2012 Maybach 62 | 2009 Mercury Sable |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Class | Large Cars | Large Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 5-spd | Automatic 6-spd |
| Cylinders | 12 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 5.5 | 3.5 |
| City MPG | 10 | 18 |
| Highway MPG | 16 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 12 | 21 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $5750 | $2850 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 740.5833333333334 | 423.1904761904762 |
🚗 2012 Maybach 62
Large Cars with 12 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Maybach 62 Profile →🚗 2009 Mercury Sable
Large Cars with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mercury Sable Profile →