2026 Mazda 3 vs 2026 Audi A3
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 30 MPG vs 28 MPG combined — Mazda 3 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2250 vs $2900 — Mazda 3 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Premium Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Mazda 3 | 2026 Audi A3 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Premium Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (AM-S7) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 27 | 24 |
| Highway MPG | 36 | 34 |
| Combined MPG | 30 | 28 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2250 | $2900 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 294.0 | 323.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
🚗 2026 Mazda 3
Compact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 3 Profile →🚗 2026 Audi A3
Subcompact Cars with 28 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Audi A3 Profile →🔗 Related