2026 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Lexus CT
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 30 MPG vs 42 MPG combined — Lexus CT is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2250 vs $1400 — Lexus CT saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Mazda 3 | 2017 Lexus CT |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2017 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| City MPG | 27 | 43 |
| Highway MPG | 36 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 30 | 42 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2250 | $1400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 294.0 | 212.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 9/10 |
🚗 2026 Mazda 3
Compact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 3 Profile →🚗 2017 Lexus CT
Compact Cars with 42 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Lexus CT Profile →🔗 Related