2015 Mazda 5 vs 2008 Chevrolet Uplander
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 19 MPG combined — Mazda 5 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $3150 — Mazda 5 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2015 Mazda 5 | 2008 Chevrolet Uplander |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2015 | 2008 |
| Class | Minivan - 2WD | Minivan - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S5) | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 3.9 |
| City MPG | 21 | 16 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 23 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 19 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $3150 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.0 | 467.7368421052632 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2015 Mazda 5
Minivan - 2WD with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 5 Profile →🚗 2008 Chevrolet Uplander
Minivan - 2WD with 19 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Uplander Profile →