2002 Mazda 626 vs 2006 Dodge Stratus
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 25 MPG vs 22 MPG combined — Mazda 626 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2400 vs $2700 — Mazda 626 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2002 Mazda 626 | 2006 Dodge Stratus |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2002 | 2006 |
| Class | Midsize Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| City MPG | 23 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 29 | 27 |
| Combined MPG | 25 | 22 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2400 | $2700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 355.48 | 403.95454545454544 |
🚗 2002 Mazda 626
Midsize Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 626 Profile →🚗 2006 Dodge Stratus
Midsize Cars with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Dodge Stratus Profile →🔗 Related