2026 Mazda CX-5 vs 2020 BYD e6
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 26 MPG vs 72 MPG combined — BYD e6 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2600 vs $1050 — BYD e6 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2026 Mazda CX-5 | 2020 BYD e6 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2020 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | — |
| City MPG | 24 | 73 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 71 |
| Combined MPG | 26 | 72 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2600 | $1050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 339.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | 10/10 |
🚗 2026 Mazda CX-5
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda CX-5 Profile →🚗 2020 BYD e6
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 72 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BYD e6 Profile →🔗 Related