2026 Mazda CX-5 vs 2026 Ford Escape
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 26 MPG vs 40 MPG combined — Ford Escape is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2600 vs $1700 — Ford Escape saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Mazda CX-5 | 2026 Ford Escape |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 24 | 42 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 37 |
| Combined MPG | 26 | 40 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2600 | $1700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 339.0 | 222.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | 9/10 |
🚗 2026 Mazda CX-5
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda CX-5 Profile →🚗 2026 Ford Escape
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 40 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escape Profile →🔗 Related