2006 Mazda MPV vs 2008 Chevrolet Uplander
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 18 MPG vs 19 MPG combined — Chevrolet Uplander is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3300 vs $3150 — Chevrolet Uplander saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2006 Mazda MPV | 2008 Chevrolet Uplander |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2006 | 2008 |
| Class | Minivan - 2WD | Minivan - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 5-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.0 | 3.9 |
| City MPG | 16 | 16 |
| Highway MPG | 23 | 23 |
| Combined MPG | 18 | 19 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3300 | $3150 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 493.72222222222223 | 467.7368421052632 |
🚗 2006 Mazda MPV
Minivan - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda MPV Profile →🚗 2008 Chevrolet Uplander
Minivan - 2WD with 19 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Uplander Profile →