2003 Mazda Protege/Protege 5 vs 2005 Toyota Echo
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 33 MPG combined — Toyota Echo is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $1800 — Toyota Echo saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2003 Mazda Protege/Protege 5 | 2005 Toyota Echo |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2003 | 2005 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 22 | 30 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 38 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 33 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $1800 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 269.3030303030303 |
🚗 2003 Mazda Protege/Protege 5
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda Protege/Protege 5 Profile →🚗 2005 Toyota Echo
Compact Cars with 33 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Toyota Echo Profile →🔗 Related