2011 Mazda Tribute vs 2026 Jeep Compass
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 32 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — Mazda Tribute is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1850 vs $2600 — Mazda Tribute saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 Mazda Tribute | 2026 Jeep Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (variable gear ratios) | Automatic 8-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 34 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 31 |
| Combined MPG | 32 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1850 | $2600 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 277.71875 | 335.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 4/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 4/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 3/5 |
🚗 2011 Mazda Tribute
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 32 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda Tribute Profile →🚗 2026 Jeep Compass
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Jeep Compass Profile →🔗 Related