2009 Mercury Sable vs 2021 Mazda 6
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 21 MPG vs 29 MPG combined — Mazda 6 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2850 vs $2050 — Mazda 6 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2009 Mercury Sable | 2021 Mazda 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2009 | 2021 |
| Class | Large Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 18 | 26 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 35 |
| Combined MPG | 21 | 29 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2850 | $2050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 423.1904761904762 | 302.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
🚗 2009 Mercury Sable
Large Cars with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mercury Sable Profile →🚗 2021 Mazda 6
Midsize Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 6 Profile →🔗 Related