2009 Mercury Sable vs 2012 Saab 9-5
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 21 MPG vs 24 MPG combined — Saab 9-5 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2850 vs $2500 — Saab 9-5 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2009 Mercury Sable | 2012 Saab 9-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2009 | 2012 |
| Class | Large Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-spd | Manual 6-spd |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 3.5 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 18 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 32 |
| Combined MPG | 21 | 24 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2850 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 423.1904761904762 | 370.2916666666667 |
🚗 2009 Mercury Sable
Large Cars with 21 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mercury Sable Profile →🚗 2012 Saab 9-5
Midsize Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-5 Profile →🔗 Related