2016 MINI Paceman vs 2018 Ford Focus
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 29 MPG vs 107 MPG combined — Ford Focus is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2400 vs $700 — Ford Focus saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2016 MINI Paceman | 2018 Ford Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 1.6 | — |
| City MPG | 26 | 118 |
| Highway MPG | 32 | 96 |
| Combined MPG | 29 | 107 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2400 | $700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 311.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 7/10 | 10/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 7/10 | 10/10 |
🚗 2016 MINI Paceman
Compact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full MINI Paceman Profile →🚗 2018 Ford Focus
Compact Cars with 107 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Focus Profile →🔗 Related