2016 MINI Paceman vs 2021 Mazda 2
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 29 MPG vs 35 MPG combined — Mazda 2 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2400 vs $1700 — Mazda 2 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2016 MINI Paceman | 2021 Mazda 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2016 | 2021 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 26 | 32 |
| Highway MPG | 32 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 29 | 35 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2400 | $1700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 311.0 | 253.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
🚗 2016 MINI Paceman
Compact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full MINI Paceman Profile →🚗 2021 Mazda 2
Compact Cars with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 2 Profile →🔗 Related