2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs 2005 Toyota Celica
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 26 MPG vs 28 MPG combined — Toyota Celica is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2600 vs $2150 — Toyota Celica saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross | 2005 Toyota Celica |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2005 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S8) | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| City MPG | 25 | 25 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 33 |
| Combined MPG | 26 | 28 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2600 | $2150 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 339.0 | 317.39285714285717 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 4/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Profile →🚗 2005 Toyota Celica
Subcompact Cars with 28 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Toyota Celica Profile →