2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs 2016 Volkswagen Eos
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 26 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2600 vs $2750 — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Premium Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross | 2016 Volkswagen Eos |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2016 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Premium Gasoline |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S8) | Automatic (AM-S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 25 | 22 |
| Highway MPG | 28 | 30 |
| Combined MPG | 26 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2600 | $2750 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 339.0 | 354.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 4/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Profile →🚗 2016 Volkswagen Eos
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volkswagen Eos Profile →