2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2021 Mazda 2
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 30 MPG vs 35 MPG combined — Mazda 2 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2000 vs $1700 — Mazda 2 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2021 Mazda 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2017 | 2021 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S6) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 27 | 32 |
| Highway MPG | 34 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 30 | 35 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2000 | $1700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 295.0 | 253.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
🚗 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer
Compact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mitsubishi Lancer Profile →🚗 2021 Mazda 2
Compact Cars with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 2 Profile →