2027 Rolls-Royce Ghost vs 2018 Ford C-MAX
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 13 MPG vs 40 MPG combined — Ford C-MAX is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $6300 vs $1500 — Ford C-MAX saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2027 Rolls-Royce Ghost | 2018 Ford C-MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2027 | 2018 |
| Class | Large Cars | Large Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S8) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 12 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 6.7 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 11 | 42 |
| Highway MPG | 18 | 38 |
| Combined MPG | 13 | 40 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $6300 | $1500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 656.0 | 222.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 1/10 | 9/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 2/10 | 9/10 |
🚗 2027 Rolls-Royce Ghost
Large Cars with 13 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Rolls-Royce Ghost Profile →🚗 2018 Ford C-MAX
Large Cars with 40 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford C-MAX Profile →