2012 Saab 9-3 vs 2021 Mazda 2
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 35 MPG combined — Mazda 2 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $1700 — Mazda 2 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2012 Saab 9-3 | 2021 Mazda 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2021 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 20 | 32 |
| Highway MPG | 32 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 35 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $1700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 253.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 7/10 |
🚗 2012 Saab 9-3
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-3 Profile →🚗 2021 Mazda 2
Compact Cars with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 2 Profile →🔗 Related