2012 Saab 9-3 vs 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $2600 — Saab 9-3 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2012 Saab 9-3 | 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2026 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 20 | 25 |
| Highway MPG | 32 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $2600 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 339.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 5/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 4/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 4/5 |
🚗 2012 Saab 9-3
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-3 Profile →🚗 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Profile →