2012 Saab 9-4 vs 2020 BYD e6
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 20 MPG vs 72 MPG combined — BYD e6 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3000 vs $1050 — BYD e6 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2012 Saab 9-4 | 2020 BYD e6 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2020 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 6 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 3.0 | — |
| City MPG | 18 | 73 |
| Highway MPG | 24 | 71 |
| Combined MPG | 20 | 72 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3000 | $1050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 444.35 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 10/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 10/10 |
🚗 2012 Saab 9-4
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 20 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-4 Profile →🚗 2020 BYD e6
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 72 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BYD e6 Profile →🔗 Related