2012 Saab 9-5 vs 2010 Saturn Aura
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — Saturn Aura is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $2300 — Saturn Aura saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2012 Saab 9-5 | 2010 Saturn Aura |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Class | Midsize Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| City MPG | 20 | 22 |
| Highway MPG | 32 | 33 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $2300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 341.8076923076923 |
🚗 2012 Saab 9-5
Midsize Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-5 Profile →🚗 2010 Saturn Aura
Midsize Cars with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saturn Aura Profile →🔗 Related