2002 Saturn SL vs 2003 Ford Escort
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 29 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — Saturn SL is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2050 vs $2400 — Saturn SL saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2002 Saturn SL | 2003 Ford Escort |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2002 | 2003 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.9 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 25 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 36 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 29 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2050 | $2400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 306.44827586206895 | 355.48 |
🚗 2002 Saturn SL
Compact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saturn SL Profile →🚗 2003 Ford Escort
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escort Profile →🔗 Related