2006 Scion xA vs 2011 Suzuki Swift
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 30 MPG vs 29 MPG combined — Scion xA is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2000 vs $2050 — Scion xA saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2006 Scion xA | 2011 Suzuki Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2006 | 2011 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Manual 5-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| City MPG | 27 | 27 |
| Highway MPG | 35 | 34 |
| Combined MPG | 30 | 29 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2000 | $2050 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 296.23333333333335 | 306.44827586206895 |
🚗 2006 Scion xA
Subcompact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Scion xA Profile →🚗 2011 Suzuki Swift
Subcompact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Swift Profile →🔗 Related