2006 Subaru Baja vs 2011 Mazda Tribute
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 22 MPG vs 32 MPG combined — Mazda Tribute is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2700 vs $1850 — Mazda Tribute saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2006 Subaru Baja | 2011 Mazda Tribute |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2006 | 2011 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 20 | 34 |
| Highway MPG | 26 | 30 |
| Combined MPG | 22 | 32 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2700 | $1850 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 403.95454545454544 | 277.71875 |
🚗 2006 Subaru Baja
Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Subaru Baja Profile →🚗 2011 Mazda Tribute
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 32 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda Tribute Profile →🔗 Related