2026 Subaru Forester vs 2026 GMC Terrain
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 35 MPG vs 27 MPG combined — Subaru Forester is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1950 vs $2500 — Subaru Forester saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Subaru Forester | 2026 GMC Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S6) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 35 | 26 |
| Highway MPG | 34 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 35 | 27 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1950 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 255.0 | 329.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Rollover | 4/5 | 4/5 |
🚗 2026 Subaru Forester
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Subaru Forester Profile →🚗 2026 GMC Terrain
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full GMC Terrain Profile →🔗 Related